Anglesea - LiDAR
  • MetaShare PROD
  •  
  •  
  •  

  Anglesea - LiDAR

dataset
Dataset: Anglesea - LiDAR Assembly: Single
 
Citation proposal Citation proposal

Anglesea - LiDAR

Department of Transport and Planning

https://metashare.maps.vic.gov.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/7cb372e7-a1b4-57a2-8441-34491e27abb5
 
  • Description
  • Temporal
  • Spatial
  • Maintenance
  • Format
  • Contacts
  • Keywords
  • Resource Constraints
  • Lineage
  • Metadata Constraints
  • Quality
  • Acquisition Info
  • Raster Data Details
  • Raster Type Details
  • Point Cloud Data Details
  • Contour Data Details
  • Survey Details

Simple

 
 

Description

Title
Anglesea - LiDAR 
 
 

Temporal

Time period
2016-01-112016-01-11 
 
 

Spatial

Horizontal Accuracy
0.3m  
Vertical Accuracy
0.1m  
Code
MGA Zone 55 GDA94 
 
 

Maintenance

 
 

Format

Title
LAS 1.3 
 
 

Contacts

  Point of contact

Department of Transport and Planning - Coordinated Imagery Program  
PO Box 500
East Melbourne
Victoria
3002
Australia
 
 

Keywords

Topic category
  • Elevation
 
 

Resource Constraints

Use limitation
General 
Classification
Unclassified  
 
 

Lineage

Description
An instrument calibration issue was encountered with the LiDAR system during initial pre-processing. The issue was caused by an internal calibration error between channel 1 and channel 2. It manifests itself by producing a fluctuating, vertical, misalignment between both channels in the range of 0.05 - 0.20m (relative accuracy). It was resolved by an internal calibration correction (provided by sensor manufacturer - Riegl) being applied to all flights of LiDAR data in this project. This delayed production for approximately three weeks. Reduction of the LiDAR data proceeded without any significant problems, Laser strikes were classified into ground and non-ground points using a single algorithm across the project area. Manual checking and editing of the data classification further improved the quality of the terrain model. 
 
 

Metadata Constraints

Classification
Unclassified  
 
 

Quality

Attribute Quality
Positional Accuracy
Conceptual Consistency
Comments
Accuracy of the ground surface under dense canopy may be reduced due to diminished returns. Laser accuracy at swath edges may be reduced. Classification algorithms have been tailored for common terrain/vegetation combinations across the project area. Classification accuracy and ground definition may be less accurate in uncommon or mixed terrain/vegetation/land use combinations. This data has been classified to an ICSM level 2 standard where there is an emphasis on ground classification accuracy only. 
Missing Data
Comments
The point cloud data is complete for the defined project extent. Gaps may occur due to diminished returns over water, under canopy and on materials with low laser reflectivity, such as black roofing or swimming pools. 
Excess Data
 
 

Acquisition Info

Platform Type
Aerial  
Assembly
Single  
Tile Size
2 km  
 
 

Raster Data Details

 
 

Point Cloud Data Details

Pulse Mode
Multi Pulse 
Scan Rate (Hz)
102Hz  
Scan Frequency (kHz)
330kHz  
Scan Angle (degrees)
60degrees  
Footprint Size (m)
0.33500001m  
Point Density Actual (pts/m2)
0.06points/m2  
Point Spacing Actual (pts/m)
4points/m2  
Ellipsoid Provided
1 
Ellipsoid Vertical Datum
AUSGEOID09  
Ellipsoid Format
LAS 1.3  
Geoid Vertical Datum
AUSGEOID09  
Additional Adjustments
Ground data in this volume has been compared to 270 test points obtained by field survey and assumed to be error-free. The test points were distributed in three groups across the mapping area and located on open clear ground. Comparison of the field test points with elevations interpolated from measured data for the three sites resulted in 0.943, 0.891 & 0.885 RMS (m). The mean difference at each site has been removed from the data. Final accuracy estimates after removing the mean offsets yielded 0.031, 0.032 & 0.016 RMS(m). 
Class Level
2 
Classification Accuracy
98 
Classification
Class Level Classification Accuracy Class 0 - Unclassified Class 1 - Default Class 2 - Ground Class 3 - Low Vegetation Class 4 - Medium Vegetation Class 5 - High Vegetation Class 6 - Buildings/Structures Class 7 - Low/High Points Class 8 - Model Key Points Class 9- Water Class 10 - Bridge Class 12 - Flightline Overlap Points
2 98 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
 
 

Contour Data Details

 
 

Survey Details

Sensor

Title
Riegl Q1560 
Identifier
Aerial

Type
LIDAR 
Cloud Cover Percentage
0 
 

Aerial Survey Details

Runs
6 
Run Orientation
NE-SW, E-W  
Swath Width
2300 
Side Overlap
20 
Forward Overlap
60 
Flying Height Unit
agl metre  
Flight Height
2000 
 
 

    Overviews

  Provided by

  Share on social sites

         

  Views Views

  • Simple
  • Simple
  • Full
  • XML
7cb372e7-a1b4-57a2-8441-34491e27abb5   Access to the portal Access to the portal Read here the full details and access to the data. Read here the full details and access to the data.

  Associated resources

Not available


  •  
  •  
  •