Index of Estuarine Condition Submerged Vegetation Data
dataset:
IEC2021_SUB_VEG
IEC2021_SUB_VEG is the spatial representation of submerged vegetation used in the calculation of Index of Estuarine Condition (IEC) scores. In the context of the IEC, 'submerged vegetation' refers to aquatic plants attached to bottom sediments that are generally entirely submerged but may be exposed during very low tides. Field data was collected at various locations within the estuary to ground-truth the mapping of full coverage derived from available aerial imagery. The field data was collected in late spring, summer and early autumn to correspond with warmer water temperatures and longer photoperiods, and to avoid winter periods of submerged vegetation dieback. In the field, ground-truthing by taking photos of the benthic environment largely followed the protocols outlined in Woodland and Cook (2015). If the estuarine bed was visible, photographic samples were collected of the different vegetation types present. Coverages of these different vegetation types (e.g. dense, sparse) were also photographed as well as bare ground. Ground-truthed benthic images were mapped over high-resolution (<20 cm) aerial imagery sourced from the DELWP imagery archive. Only imagery later than 2010 was considered, with most of the imagery used captured later than 2015. RPAS imagery collected for some estuaries was geo-rectified and mosaicked to provide very high-resolution imagery for mapping. Mapped areas were then compared to the geo-referenced ground-truthed benthic images and assigned a vegetation-coverage class and an indication of classification confidence (High, Medium or Low). For each estuary, MA:TV was then derived from the ratio of total macroalgae area to total vegetated area (i.e. seagrass and macroalgae) as per Woodland and Cook (2015). Briefly, vegetated habitat areas were weighted by their coverage classes such that polygons assigned `sparse¿medium¿ coverage were considered to contain 50% vegetation, and those assigned as `dense¿ coverage were considered as 100% vegetated. The ratio of macroalgae to total vegetation (MA:TV) was calculated as the sum of the weighted macroalgae areas divided by the sum of the weighted seagrass and macroalgae areas. MA:TV ranges from 0 to 1.
|
Citation proposal Citation proposal
(2021) Index of Estuarine Condition Submerged Vegetation Data Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action https://metashare.maps.vic.gov.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/ae75c7f7-2665-5169-9fc6-cd244aab88d1 |
- Description
- Temporal
- Spatial
- Maintenance
- Format
- Contacts
- Keywords
- Resource Constraints
- Lineage
- Metadata Constraints
- Quality
- Acquisition Info
- Raster Data Details
- Raster Type Details
- Point Cloud Data Details
- Contour Data Details
- Survey Details
Simple
Description
- Title
- Index of Estuarine Condition Submerged Vegetation Data
- Alternate title
- IEC2021_SUB_VEG
- Purpose
- Component of the Index for Estuarine Condition
- Supplemental Information
- Related Documents: None
- Status
- Completed
Temporal
Spatial
- Code
- 4283
Maintenance
- Maintenance and update frequency
- Not planned
Format
Contacts
Point of contact
Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action
-
VSDL Data Manager
(VSDL Data Manager)
PO Box 500
East Melbourne
Vic
3002
Australia
Cited responsible party
No information provided.
Cited responsible party
No information provided.
Cited responsible party
No information provided.
Cited responsible party
No information provided.
Keywords
- Topic category
-
- Inland waters
- Oceans
Resource Constraints
- Classification
- Unclassified
Lineage
- Statement
- Dataset Source: Field sub sampling and digitisation from high resolution aerial imagery conducted by the Arthur Rylah Institute. Classifications sourced from Pope, A., J. Barton, and G. P. Quinn. 2015. Victorian Index of Estuary Condition: Implementation Trial Final Report. Warrnambool, Victoria. Dataset Originality: Primary & Derived
- Description
- Source description not available
- Description
- Source description not available
Metadata Constraints
- Classification
- Unclassified
Quality
Attribute Quality
- Comments
- Vegetation classifications are outlined in Pope et al (2015) and derived from field sub sampling and high resolution aerial imagery
Positional Accuracy
- Comments
- Polygons are derived from references to multiple sources of high resolution aerial imagery during time periods suitable to field sampling events.
Conceptual Consistency
Missing Data
- Comments
- Statewide Completeness Verification: -
Excess Data
- Comments
- -
Acquisition Info
Raster Data Details
Point Cloud Data Details
Contour Data Details
Survey Details
Overviews
Provided by
Views Views
ae75c7f7-2665-5169-9fc6-cd244aab88d1
Access to the portal Access to the portal
Read here the full details and access to the data. Read here the full details and access to the data.
Associated resources
Not available